Introduction
In the age of clingy budgets, many industries, from the level of enterprise to minor and mediocre sized business, are considering well-organized and new techniques to achieve their web hosting requirements. The hosting settings are varying these days and therefore many are looking outside the old setups, and into the potentials of cloud hosting. Cloud Hosting has proven to be very trustworthy, easily accessible and cheap hosting solution that is different from the old-style solutions of hosting in terms of many features. Following is a comparison of cloud computing and google shared server that will make the difference more clear for the user.
Cloud computing comparison with Google shared server
Google shared hosting is among most widespread servers of the world that is suitable even for the tightest financial plan. But making use of a shared hosting solution also implies to the fact that the operator has to share his private server capitals with other operators working at the same time. If a web page is presented on a Google shared hosting server, all the information and the apps the user is consuming, will be accommodated with the apps of all other operators on the same server. Similarly, a web page will share the similar Google server resources as all websites present on the server i.e. CPU, Memory, disc space and bandwidth. The servers working on Google shared hosting is loaded abundantly all the time so if one web page burdens the Google server, all operators will undergo low speed or downtime interruptions. Another main issue is the partial resources at the disposal. Sharing a Google server would mean to share the resources of the system with other workers on one corporeal machine and consequently every user will have some limitations on their facilities. For instance, if any of the operators on the Google shared server practices a lot of traffic, CPU cycles and email transportation then all the people on the same machine are expected to experience poor performance of shared hosting.
